View Full Version : Michael Jackson, Did He Do It?
Ronin Da Bomb Dec 22, 2003, 00:28 Michael Jackson Was Charged The Other Day With 7 Counts Of Child Abuse Related Crimes. Do You Think He's Guilty. I Know Mentally, He Is Fucked Up, Obviously It Is From His Childhood/Dad And Has The Mental Age Of An 8 Year Old. And That Some Of The Stuff (Sleeping In The Same Room As Children) Is REALLY Weird. I Dunno, I Just Find It Difficult To Say He Did It Straight Out. He May Or May Not Be Guilty. What Do You Think?
Nope, he had trouble making the kids he has supposedly fathered......
Flim flam, he is a hot target. Plenty of dosh and plenty of frailties.
Dont stop him from being as mad as a hatter though.
daidavies Dec 22, 2003, 02:46 Yep.
He is one hell of an easy target.
cmontgom Dec 22, 2003, 03:26 Jacko's a freak for sure....
but these allegations had already been checked out by the LA DA and discarded as false.
The DA and Sherrif around Neverland have long had it out for Jacko.. the televised press conference announcing charges against Jacko were like a stand up comedy thing from a 2nd rate club...
Jackson is certainly bent beyond our understanding, and may be a child molestor (or closet Republican) but these charges won't stand...
trxiegirl71 Dec 22, 2003, 04:04 I think that he is a fruit and probably did do it, but who am I to judge?
bassoon Dec 22, 2003, 04:18 He should probably be placed under observation for study either way. He's obviously mentally ill, and is a danger to his face as well as little boys.
I think he is guilty of having improper relatoinships with children, but I dont think that it is sexual abuse. But to be fair I think its all brought on by the fact that he isn't right in the head anyway.
magicguppy Dec 22, 2003, 09:40 Of course he did it!!!!
And R-Kelly helped him!
neildeal Dec 22, 2003, 10:01 I'd imagine that we'll never find out the truth, which is a shame.
Personally i think he did do, has done it and would do it again.
i mean, just look at the state of his face!
Adult rules: MJ is v dodgy because he likes to spend time with kids.
MJ rules: No problems involved in spending time with children because he just wants to be friends.
That is the crux of the problem. MJ is obviously very seriously mentally ill, and has a somwhat retarded emotional development. I believe that he does just want to be friends with the kids because they are the only people he feels he can relate to, and with whom he feels comfortable.
Unfortunately, he has mature adult hormones and urges, but maybe does not quite understand what they are or how to deal with them. A case in point: I met a special needs teacher, and she told me that it is impossible to stop some sub-normal adolescents from sitting down in a corridor and masturbating. They do this because they have the urge, and they know that it feels good. And if it feels good, why should they not do it? Q.E.D.
In my opinion he did assualt children, but he has no conception that what he did was wrong.
Eertamai Dec 22, 2003, 10:54 Michael Jackson only has himself to blame for the trouble he is in now. Sleeping with other peoples children in your bed is odd, and if he couldn't understand that then someone else close to him should have had a word.
This molesting claim happened before but he didnt change and its come back to get him now. I really really hope he didnt do it, but he is so messed up in his head that if he is found guilty, then it wont be a shock.
Ronin Da Bomb Dec 22, 2003, 12:36 Eertamai spouted:
Michael Jackson only has himself to blame for the trouble he is in now. Sleeping with other peoples children in your bed is odd, and if he couldn't understand that then someone else close to him should have had a word.
Actually, Uri Gellar Has Told Him, Infact Shouted At Him, Twice About This, Hes Even Told Him He Shouldnt Hold Hands With Kids
Personally I Think He's Innocent. But I Also Think He Is Now 100% Loopy And Has Been For The Last 5 Years. He Needs Help. And Being The Star He Is, Should Of Got It Years Ago.
neildeal Dec 22, 2003, 12:38 How do you know when it's time to go to bed in the jackson house?
When the big hand touches the little hand.
(crap joke, which should be in the joke area)
DoodleBug Dec 22, 2003, 14:41 He's as guilty as a puppy sitting next to a pile of poo.
Put him in a cell with Huntley.
AnthillMob Dec 22, 2003, 19:49 i think he's guilty.
i also think his kids should be taken away from him for their own safety and well being even if he is found innocent.
justbecause Dec 22, 2003, 20:17 I don't think he's guilty, just very, very niave. He definately has psychological and mental problems if he thinks it's ok to share a bed with other people's children on a regular basis. I think he's done it because he had such a bad childhood and he's trying to recapture it now.
I don't think he even understands why people would think he's doing something wrong.
UnoChild Dec 22, 2003, 20:25 I agree with justbecause. I wouldn't for one minute condone him sharing a room/bed with kids, but I dont think he is capable of child abuse. He is , in his own mind a child and isn't aware of why what he does/is doing is wrong....
I think however he is becoming/has become a joke in the public eye which is a shame when you consider how much he has done for popular music.
look kids....it's easy....innocent until proven guilty . or is that too liberal for you.sure there is ian huntley , but there is also mathew kelly . if you want to go back far enough , there is fatty arbuckle.
still hasn't stopped me from going into shops and placing small pictures of gary glitters face over jackos on his latest comp album though.
Goat Rider Dec 23, 2003, 10:43 he did it
i dont know if he did it or not, the courts will decide whether he is guilty. But it is a sad world we live in, where you cannot sleep next to a child, as your intentions can be questioned-because unfortunately, there are some sick people in the world who molest children.
And it is rightly so that Michael Jackson is being charged for this, because he is a single middle aged man, who should not be sleeping in bed with young boys, whom he bears no relation to, innocent or not, because he has already been in deep shit about this. Such behaviour for which he has already been bollocked for, should not have been repeated.
My nephew who is is 12, always asks to sleep next to me when i go round because we chat for ages, watch movies and eat junk food before going to sleep. I have never even thought about anyone questioning that, but then again im not a multi millionaire, who has had child sex allegations against him, yet still did not behave cautiously. MJ has obviously lost the plot.
Dazzla Dec 23, 2003, 14:42 Who. Fucking. Cares.?
People who have lives are typically not particularly interested in those of people they've never met and who would treat them with disdain if they ever did.
dave brown Dec 23, 2003, 15:21 He may be a fruitcake and an odd-ball but I think He's more than likely innocent.
unordinarychild spouted:
I agree with justbecause. I wouldn't for one minute condone him sharing a room/bed with kids, but I dont think he is capable of child abuse. He is , in his own mind a child and isn't aware of why what he does/is doing is wrong....
I think however he is becoming/has become a joke in the public eye which is a shame when you consider how much he has done for popular music.
I agree with this statement and I think that he is not quite all there and there are other people out doing this just because he is who he is.
sumoeggnoodle Dec 24, 2003, 21:42 I have three points:
1) If you are a parent or guardian, as some of you are, would you allow your kids to stay overnight at the house of someone who was accused of abusing children and only avoided trial by paying off the accuser?
2) If you have been accused of child abuse, would you have groups of children over to your house to stay overnight?
3) He claims to feel like Peter Pan and is child-like because he missed out on his childhood. This extended childhood has lasted for over twenty years. My childhood lasted for eleven years.
Jedichef Dec 25, 2003, 23:24 wannabepornstar spouted:
Adult rules: MJ is v dodgy because he likes to spend time with kids.
MJ rules: No problems involved in spending time with children because he just wants to be friends.
That is the crux of the problem. MJ is obviously very seriously mentally ill, and has a somwhat retarded emotional development. I believe that he does just want to be friends with the kids because they are the only people he feels he can relate to, and with whom he feels comfortable.
Unfortunately, he has mature adult hormones and urges, but maybe does not quite understand what they are or how to deal with them. A case in point: I met a special needs teacher, and she told me that it is impossible to stop some sub-normal adolescents from sitting down in a corridor and masturbating. They do this because they have the urge, and they know that it feels good. And if it feels good, why should they not do it? Q.E.D.
In my opinion he did assualt children, but he has no conception that what he did was wrong.
i'm sorry but thats not fair on him. maybe he does just want to be friends to kids? his childhood was fucked and hes trying to make sure that doesnt happen to others.
the world is in a sad state when someone can be domonised for trying to be nice. maybe hes a bit weird but i reckon he gets a very hard time.
He's not doing himself any favours by getting involved with those Nation of Islam crazies.
Now he's saying that he was abused by the police when they nicked him, that he was locked in toilet with walls smeared with "doo doo faeces."
On a TV interview here, he said that his shoulder had been dislocated by the cops and he can't raise his arm above chest height and then goes on 2 minutes later to use the same arm to run his hand through his hair!!!
The police have countered with tapes showing him healthy and happy leaving the station and audio tapes of the cops being pleasant to him after he was nicked and Jackson saying he was fine.
He's a liar.
He's guilty.
Geoneil Jan 2, 2004, 19:59 Guilty or not, I wouldn't trust him with any children I was responsible for, I voted guilty in this because, quite simply, there is something completely odd about his behaviour towards children, something deeply, deeply unsettling.
Take those children away from him, you don't have kids round just to sleep with them, it's not on. Everything about him, says he should not have children anywhere near him.
Beatrix Kiddo May 17, 2006, 07:24 I have three points:
1) If you are a parent or guardian, as some of you are, would you allow your kids to stay overnight at the house of someone who was accused of abusing children and only avoided trial by paying off the accuser?
yes, because then i could claim said accuser accused said child and sue said fucker for all he's worth.
My childhood lasted for eleven years.
are you that 11-year-old pregnant scottish girl?
UnoChild May 17, 2006, 07:41 yes, because then i could claim said accuser accused said child and sue said fucker for all he's worth.
I hope you're attempting to be ironic. Otherwise you are scum. That is all.
Beatrix Kiddo May 17, 2006, 07:57 I hope you're attempting to be ironic. Otherwise you are scum.
bit of both.
hugo-a-gogo May 17, 2006, 08:18 yay for arguing with peoples posts from two years ago! (not uno)
which numb cunt dragged this back from the dead?
Gentreau May 17, 2006, 09:20 This One (http://board.dogbomb.co.uk/member.php?userid=18106)
allyourbase May 17, 2006, 10:45 Lets pretend he is still on trial and that he hasnt been aquitted yet, it then means that we can stand by our comments because he got off....
I think Michael Jackson is a little fucked up, but Im confident he will get off as I dont think he did it. Naive, yes, paedophile no......I reckon after the trial he will go and live in Jordan (not the busty glamour model and wife of Peter Andre, but the COuntry)...I also reckon he will sell Neverland, oh and he will release another greatest hits album.....
Greasy Art May 17, 2006, 14:58 I think Michael Jackson was amazing in 'Captain EO'.
hugo-a-gogo May 17, 2006, 19:44 This One (http://board.dogbomb.co.uk/member.php?userid=18106)
nah, at least two people voted on it to drag back to the top first
dictatario May 20, 2006, 22:17 I think he definitely did it. There were far too many people saying that he did. And why have a kids' theme park at your house and have young boys staying over sleeping with you in your bed? Then there was the incident when he dangled his baby son over the balcony, which just proved he's nuts.
|
|