View Full Version : Big Brother manipulating vote
scotsman77 Jun 29, 2005, 03:46 Why when Vanessa Talked about who to nominate everyone went up for eviction, but when Ant' and maxwell did it they werent allowed to vote?
Do you think this was an attempt by the producers to break up the cliques that had formed in the house. I only wonder as stopping two people voting from the one "group" in the house would have predictible results.
madpinkflamingo Jun 29, 2005, 04:21 yeah Im getting pretty confused too about this 'talking about nominations' lark. I thought they had to mention names or something.
Maybe Vanessa talks in such riddles it flew over BB's head. Or maybe BB just wants to show 2 bullies where the lines are drawn. Talking of which, why wasnt Saskia dragged in the diary room and warned about her threatening behaviour towards Makosi?
Ace telly tho.
seabreeze Jun 29, 2005, 05:03 Vanessa did mention a name. Although Max and Anthony didn`t they were discussing nominations which is not allowed.
as far as I know during the incident Saskia was called into the diary room.
Eertamai Jun 29, 2005, 07:27 Vanessa did mention a name. Although Max and Anthony didn`t they were discussing nominations which is not allowed.
Vanessa disscussed who she was going to nominate and gave an exact name. All Maxwell and Anthony talked about is if they were going to use any tactics and if each other were sure of who to vote for. Vanessa has got off extremely lightly compared to Maxwell and Anthony, because those two surely would have nominated Science, meaning he was up for a certain eviction.
BB edits the show to suit the route they want to take. After Saskia apologised to Makosi, (talking about yourself in the 3rd person shows you to be a pompous moron) and had her words accepted, it looked like Makosi was about to start slagging Saskia off when she left the room, even though she had just accepted the apology, showing again how fake she is. BB then cut the scene and went to something else before Makosi started talking. Of course I think this because I'm heavily biased and dislike the bitch. :D
enourmous david Jun 29, 2005, 10:52 OMG, say its not true.
BB are manipulating us !
I think the whole idea of BB is that they paint the picture they want. Not unlike in the book 1984 where BB tells whatever story it chooses to be in its own best interest at the time.
Remember of course that whilst Saskia did appologise (and made a really big deal of it as though she was doing Makosi a favour!) she shouldnt have acted the way she did in the first place. If she hadnt fucked up, she wouldnt have needed to appologise.
alexbluecat Jun 30, 2005, 12:05 It's a joke now. I am going to stop watching it as BB has fixed the result, Having watched the live streaming and then the show the next day BB is really trying to influence what people think of others. Watch the live streaming its all Makosi slagging Saskia off, you don't see Saskia slagging of Makosi - they are too busy having a laugh. Remember how good BB was before it was all arguments about food, Science and cider - it was about people having a laugh. And they have gone too far with how this weeks nominations have been rigged. In no other year, where BB has not influenced the nominations would irritants like Science or bores like Vanessa (liking pink does not a personality make) be nominated and out before someone like Saskia.
I am not interested in watching the show turn into the let's listen to Makosi talk about Makosi show. Team Saskia may not have been the most likeable of peope but at least they have a passing resembalance to normal people. Team listen to Makosi are all self obssessed freaks. Not one of those people are near normal.
netniV Jun 30, 2005, 17:42 It's been that way for a long time now. It was the same last year, or didn't you notice this then ?
enourmous david Jul 1, 2005, 01:54 Not one of those people are near normal.
Thats part of the qualification for getting in.
alexbluecat Jul 1, 2005, 15:44 I know but they are not remotely likeable. At least in other years they were likeable freaks. Perhaps i am just getting old - they all just seem like revolting scum to me.
Greasy Art Jul 1, 2005, 16:49 .....
I have a cat named alex... but she's black.
dogbomb Jul 2, 2005, 14:34 I think the whole idea of BB is that they paint the picture they want. Not unlike in the book 1984 where BB tells whatever story it chooses to be in its own best interest at the time.
Fucking BINGO! Someone finally gets it!
Big Brother manipulates the housemates to make the house move how they want it to. It makes for good television. If they left the house to go about its regular business, with no tasks and such... it would become tired and stale after a fortnight (if that).
Keep manipulating.
Whilst this is no doubt true , there are two Big Brothers,one female and one male.I find the male one more leniant than the female one.
The Male Big Brother seems to be more hesitant ,to say the least . Even though ,give him credit,as far as I know he was the first to swear ."it will not be Fucking tolerated Maxwell",when discussing whether maxwell put some scabs in sciences dinner,or not.
I think the female Big Brother is manipulating the male one ,in a nutshell.
enourmous david Jul 3, 2005, 04:21 I think theyre both presenters being manipulated by their editor :P
Actually, you'll find there are many Big Brother voices... but only one Big Brother... its split personality syndrome don't cha know...
|
|